What would Michael Do?

The Auto Insider section of the Detroit News ran a piece by John McCormick the other day titled “What would Carlos do?”

Read it here.

McCormick writes about the issues that GM and Ford currently face: among them legacy labor issues and pension costs – read the article – it’s a great snapshot on the current condition faced by both companies. 

McCormick tosses out the thought exercise of what would Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Renault, do if at the helm of either GM or Ford. He recounts Carlos’s now famous position that good product can save any automaker.

Coming from a different perspective – I guess I’d ask what would Michael do?

Michael as in Michael Dell.

My guess is that Dell would stream-line the system. He’d make the system as real-time integrated as possible.

He’d aggressively connect his supply system to his demand system. And then analyze the heck out of it.

Right now, the degree of integration between auto supplier (Visteon and Delphi) and most automakers and then on to and into the point of sale – the dealership's management systems would bring John Wayne’s Rooster Cogburn to tears.

This isn’t all the automakers’ fault. The dominant providers of dealer management accounting systems, ADP and Reynolds and Reynolds, are selling seriously dated non integrated technology. These systems are so old they make Phyllis Diller look young.

But back to Dell.  Dell – the company – right now has about 11 days of inventory in carry. Dell’s competition has about 80 days worth.  Want to bring a new product out? Dell does it 69 days faster. Dell shares with suppliers daily production requirements who stock product within 20 minutes of the Dell production line. Dell real-time analyzes their business looking for what ever edge that analysis can offer.

How long do you think it takes Dell to spot an issue that impacts their warranty coverage?  How long does it take an Automaker today? 

How much does Ford save if they can fix - in production - the next 5 big recall efforts - 30% faster? 

How much less would DaimlerChrysler pay for interiors from Lear if DCX transparently shared production demand with Lear - to help Lear produce more in line with demand?

Ask Steve Miller, CEO of Delphi, if this would make a difference in how he runs his business?

Ken Gilman is not a shill

Last week Fin O'Neil - 8 months old as CEO of Reynolds & Reynolds - rolled out his newly chisled growth strategy to an audience of wall street analysts at the Reynolds Analyst day. Go here to listen - and if you care about technology in Automotive retail you should.

In what I think was a rare move - with some risk - Fin invited Ken Gilman, CEO of Asbury Automotive Group to present his/Asbury's view of the marketplace as part two of the presentations offered up in in their analyst day event.  After listening to both presentations - I can say with certainty that Ken Gilman is not a shill.

Why?  Well - first, Asbury is public and so Ken Gilman was hobbled by the fact he was speaking publicly and had to be "straight" with his view of the marketplace from his perspective (for all the reasons in today's market - a CEO of a public company must be).  Second - although I suspect that Ken and Fin are good friends (how else does this sort of thing happen?) and this was somehow favor-based in orchestration - Ken didn't sing just a Reynolds song during his presentation or during his Q&A. 

In fact - I think Ken was fair and balanced and objective despite the "pro-Reynolds" nature of his involvement.  And in doing and being so - I think he helped Reynolds and Fin's cause more than he could have hurt it if he had shown up and talked up Reynolds as thought it were the end all be all...

I'm a fan of unfiltered information.  And Fin inviting Ken to present - I imagine unfilted and uncoached - created a scenario that had some associated risk.  In fact - if you listen to Ken present - especially the Q&A session, you'll hear many pro-Reynolds comments but you will also hear some  commentary that is not only negative regarding Reynolds and how it operates in the marketplace today but commentary that is negative to the very reason for the gathering itself - negative to the strategy that Fin rolled out not a couple hours earlier.

So - my hat's off to Fin and to Ken for doing something rare and risky ...

Let the dealer decide

Information Week published this article called "Automakers Refocus on CRM" recounting key themes and issues discussed at Automotive CRM Summit 2005 held in Los Angeles a few weeks back.

While not highlighted outright - in my opinion the solution to fixing the disconnected nature of automakers CRM systems to the systems their dealerships use was pointed out.  Credit to Tony Kontzer the author and Volvo's CRM Manager Elaina Verhoff for sharing it.  The solution:  Let the dealers decide.

Here's the telling quote (I added the emphasis): 

Simply getting leads to the dealers has been a problem for automakers, which have far larger retail networks than Caterpillar. Volvo Cars of North America LLC had standardized on one software tool for all of its dealers to receive and manage leads, but it discovered that many dealers were going their own way, resulting in 38 different lead-management tools in use and undermining the parent company's standardization attempts. Now, Volvo has created a program for certifying dealer tools that will give it more control over how leads are managed at the dealer level, CRM manager Elaina Verhoff said. By the end of June, Volvo will have certified eight lead-management tools from which dealers can choose.

Letting the dealer decide is the key.  By certifying numerous CRM software solutions, Volvo gets CRM tools in use at their dealers that meets their integration and information flow needs.  Volvo dealers get a more competitive CRM tools marketplace - more competition means lower costs and better software. 

The Flat World

Tom Friedman’s latest book, The World is Flat is outstanding.  Awesome.  Great. 

You might already know that Tom is great. He writes one of the best editorials on this flat planet of ours, I always enjoy his guest-spots on the various talk shows (Hardball, CNBC, etc.) and have been a fan of his since reading his book From Beirut to Jerusalem. 

If you’re involved with or around hi-tech software companies, integration software and hardware, RFID, supply-chain rationalization, logistics technology and other related fields – you’ll read this book and say “yep”.  You’ll also say “I told you so” since we’ve been looking at the business end of this shotgun (his thesis for why the world is now flat) for some time now. 

I agree.  It is flat.  And to some extent this book is a scary one – you’ll find it in your bookstore in the non-fiction section but they’d be justified sticking it in “horror” corner of the store, smack in the center of the Stephen King section (next to King’s expanded - much scarier - version of “The Stand”). 

If you’re used to competing in a round world – you better read this book.

If I were Bill Ford, CEO of Ford or Rick Wagoner, CEO of GM – I’d make this book required reading for my c-level and VP-level executives.  If I were Jim Press, President of Toyota Motor Sales of America, it’s likely I already have. 

I bet that Barbara Cooper, Ralph Szygenda and Marv Adams have read it.  If not I hope they do.

Come to think of it - Fin O’Neill, CEO of Reynolds & Reynolds, and Steve Anenen, President of ADP’s Dealer Services Group, better read this book.  Because once GM and Ford and Toyota read itand get it – and put its call-to-action into action – the implication will be dictates to you both that your companies point-of-sale island-non-integrated way-too-expensive software that you sell to their dealers WILL change. 

I’ll be clear.  One of Freidman’s major themes is the necessity for companies in the US to be get good at what he call’s “supply-chaining” or what I’ve blogged about as the real-time enterprise.  I’ll be even more clear:  I think Friedman makes his point that if you do not get serious about “supply-chaining” – you are as good as bankrupt.  Supply-chaining is the act of having your cash registers linked to your inventory control and order systems – which are further real-time linked with & shared with your suppliers. 

(To be fair to the complexity of what’s involved here, it’s more than just integration or “linking” but also the act of making the business processes more real-time and this is done by automation and capital investment in IT and some good-old role-up-your-sleeves hard work around automating what’s traditionally been manual processes – this is probably another blog…)

Automotive needs to get serious about “supply-chaining”.  And when they do – it will be the Automakers who will dictate to the vendors that make the back-office and front-office software used to sell cars at a Dealership to be rich in integration functionality (something it is NOT now).  In auto-retail – these systems are called Dealer Management Systems or DMSs.  They’re ERP systems tailored to a car dealerships software needs.

The Automakers will do this because it is this software that is the point of sale software. 

It is this software that contains the vital information that Automotive needs to share ubiquitously across and through its production chain.  (it’s not just the “data points” but the “data analysis” – the rate of change of all of the major customer touch points”)

Right now the Auto industry is a supply driven industry (a condition where inventory issues are solved by – in theory - over-supplying the system).  The bloated inventory issues constantly hammering the automakers quarterly financials quarter-over-quarter prove this supply-driven method doesn’t work.  (there are more anecdotes to back this up… which is another blog)

The industry needs to shift to become a demand driven industry ( a condition where supply is as near as possible real-time adjusted to account for localized demand).  Friedman talks about this is his book – how WalMart ships more beer to regions soon to be hit by a hurricane – since their operations-research demand division proved this is a real phenomana.  Hurricane regions also eat more pop-tarts apparently.  Beer and pop-tarts who would have figured?

To become a demand driven company – an Automaker – must have the information that the dealership management software real-time integrated to the auto makers make-a-car software system – which in turn – needs to be real-time integrated to the tiered suppliers – supply-production software. 

It’s this shift (enabled by “supply-chaining or transforming to become a real-time enterprise) that will solve a host of the problems facing the automakers today – and allow them to avoid the a number of problems getting ready to confront them tomorrow.

Build-to-order

Automotive News, hosted an Auto Manufacturing conference in Birmingham, Alabama last week.  The conference had a panel of experts discussing "Build-to-order".   In the car and truck industry - this is slang for being able to buy a car - precisely configured for how you want it - and it shows up at your local dealership exactly that way 7 days later.

Some interesting points were highlighted:

  • Jeffrey Gaudiano, BMW, said their production process enables buyers to "change" an order as little as 4 days before their car starts production...
  • Gaudiano says 71% of vehicles produced at the BMW Spartenburg, S.C. plant are for a specific buyer...
  • That only luxury car buyers care about "built-to-order" and are willing to pay for it...
  • Obstacles in the way before build-to-order hits nonluxury nameplates were 1) the US Supplier make-a-car-system is not structured that way 2) theoretically consumers are more interested in price and firm delivery dates than custom ordering and 3) US Dealerships want inventory on the lot and ready to sell at the point of sale...
  • Chuck Ernst, Honda, said Honda's Odyssey minivan takes 14 days from order to delivery...
  • Build-to-order customer expectation is the result of the personal computer industry's ability to give the customer exactly what they want, quickly.

Here's my take:  Build-to-order is coming to the auto industry and coming fast.  (as the panel highlighted - in bits and pieces - it's already here).  Automakers will offer build-to-order - not just because their car buyers want it, not just on luxury nameplates - but because build-to-order will also offer a level of cost savings and competitiveness so far unseen in the industry.  In order to get there - the Automakers will increasingly integrate their point of sale systems with their supply systems - just like in the personal computer industry (think Dell). 

Do good products solve all of a car company's problems?

Carlos Ghosn, CEO of Nissan and Renault, likes to say, “There’s no problem in a car company that good products can’t solve.”  True enough, but good cars have missed because too many of the wrong configurations and too few of the right configurations were delivered to dealers.  That’s what happens in supply-driven markets, good products fail because its manufacturer couldn’t adjust their production cycle to meet actual demand.  Demand-driven companies in comparison operate in real-time because they collect a lot of information at the point of sale and very quickly integrate that information into their supply chains.  Demand driven companies like Dell and Wal-Mart “won” because they knew what their customers wanted before their competitors did, and adjusted to demand much faster.  Every car company understands the model, knows what happened to the losers, and that something similar is happening in the auto industry.  With varying degrees of success and for some time, every car company has been working on making the demand-driven transition.   This is proving a long race that not everyone is a lock to finish. 

Being demand-driven means precise real-time knowledge of how your products are selling.  IT people call this real-time point-of-sale integration.  Wal-Mart invested large amounts of capital and resources to become demand-driven and the results were tremendous growth at the expense of competitors.  Wal-Mart drove Kmart into bankruptcy by, among many things, integrating their cash registers with their inventory restocking systems which in turn were integrated information-wise with their suppliers; all parties received this information daily and in some cases “real-time”.   Kmart suppliers had to visit Kmart stores to check inventory, only to find empty shelves and full warehouses.

One company in the Car industry will be the first to become demand-driven or “real-time”.  This company will make a significant dent in their carried inventory.  This company will have real-time information integration with suppliers and point of sale systems at their retailers to help them sell more and sell faster.  This company will take market share from the competition and reap the rewards: higher profits, better debt ratings, higher dividends, and profitable retailers.

All of the automakers selling cars and trucks in North America have made progress towards this real-time demand-driven systems architecture.  VW, DaimlerChrysler, Ford, GM and Toyota - you name it:  CIOs at these companies are strategists, and their plans and actions at their respective companies are fundamental to how successfully these companies will compete in the future.

Did you catch Barbara Cooper, CIO of Toyota Motor Sales USA holding a wrench over her shoulder on the cover of CIO Magazine?  For several years, Toyota has been quietly investing in IT systems and aligning IT with business operations.  Cooper outlined how she revolutionized IT at Toyota and turned Toyota towards real-time demand-driven decision-making.  The end result of Cooper’s efforts is a car company that thinks fast, acts fast and makes market leading business decisions.  Toyota has also nearly doubled its US market share from about 7% in 1997 to around 13% in 2005…If you compete with Toyota – you better prepare to compete at a level and at a speed that you’ve never had to before.

Steered by Super-CIO Ralph Szygenda, the GM super tanker is turning towards a more competitive IT compass heading.  Yes, they have had headline grabbing problems lately.  But do not count GM out.  They, like IBM before it, will get there: they have market leading cash reserves, excellent people, and still dominate with over twice Toyota’s US market share.  In fact, GM’s US market share is still bigger than Toyota, Honda, and Nissan combined.  The 2006 products coming to market are high quality and exciting.  Szygenda’s IT at GM exists to support the business of making and selling cars and trucks.  Szygenda’s led an IT outsourcing revolution at GM reshaping IT investments at eye popping rates. GM knows what it needs to do to become a demand-driven company, fully connected throughout its supply chain all the way into and through its retailers systems.  When GM gets there, and they will, watch out.

Bob Cosmai has a crack team and Hyundai is on a mission.  They are public with their desire to add 300 dealerships and grow US sales to greater than 1 million vehicles by 2010.  Since they are the upstart and don’t have 50 years of legacy systems holding them back – they can afford to and have the ability to put real-time systems in place day one.   The recent formation of Hyundai Information Services North America (HISNA) consolidating all North American IT operations of Hyundai and Kia suggests that Hyundai is preparing for the next stage where IT is a strategic weapon.  Hyundai is in an enviable position – they can model their information systems after the best car company IT designs (GM and Toyota) in the industry and leap frog forward with less of the legacy transition others will have to make.

So the race is on and the winners will be those who solve their problems by tying good products to a real-time understanding of their customers, suppliers and retail operations.

Why the promotion you say?

Marv Adams, SVP and CIO of Ford was recently promoted.  Why does this matter and why the promotion?

It matters because Marv Adams is 47 and he hasn’t spent the last 35 years in the car and truck industry.  He spent 10 years at IBM (working with Ford during some of those years), then spent 3 years at Xerox, then 6 at Bank One Corporation.  He joined Ford in December 2000 as VP and CIO.  He was promoted to SVP in September 2004.

On May 27 – Ford added the title of Corporate Strategy to Marv’s title.  A copy-paste from the Ford press release says the following:

Effective immediately, Adams, 47, is named Ford Motor Company senior vice president, Corporate Strategy and chief information officer.  In this expanded role, he will report to Bill Ford, the company's chairman and CEO, on corporate strategy matters, and as CIO, he will continue to report to Jim Padilla, president and chief operating officer.

The why-does-this-matter answer is that he is responsible for ALL corporate strategy not just IT strategy.  It matters because Marv Adams isn’t necessarily a “car guy” insider and it says clearly that what Marv has been up to at Ford is working and it matters to them a lot.  Enough so – that Ford expanded his role.

So what’s he been up to? Why the promotion?

He was promoted because Marv Adams sees the power of integrated IT.  He sees the power of the Ford becoming a real time enterprise and has a fundamental understanding of what Wal-Mart did to Kmart and what Dell did to Gateway.

Wal-Mart’s regional inventory supply warehouse knows what DVD you bought as you walk out the store because their cash registers are linked to their inventory control systems.  Want to hear something really scary?  The DVD supply vendor knows real-time too.  Because Wal-Mart shares that data with the supplier to optimize inventory carry.

Dell drove Gateway’s stock price from a high of $80 per share in 2001 to less than $4 at last count.  How?  Dell did it by having a relentless focus on driving cost out of their system and connecting its operations to all of its suppliers.  Dell has a reported inventory carry of 11 days while its competition has averages 80 days worth.  This means Dell can bring new product to market 69 days faster than its competition.  Dell turns a sales transaction into cash in less than 24 hours, Gateway takes 2 weeks to perform the same maneuver.

Wal-Mart and Dell are real-time enterprises.  Simply defined, a real-time enterprise is able to share information with employees, customers and partners in real-time, anytime.  This allows a company to instantly alert appropriate individuals to changes in customer demand, inventory, product problems, competitive actions and profitability.  CEOs watch dash-board monitors showing real time reports on financial results and product movement.  Sales Associates can locate a customer’s requested product immediately and almost always offer detailed delivery times and options.   The benefits of becoming a real-time enterprise are significant and numerous.  The benefit of becoming the first company in an industry to achieve real-time enterprise status is market share – market share that is almost always at the expense of your slower moving, slower decision making competitors.

But back to Marv and his promotion (did I say congratulations Mr. Adams?)...

He was promoted because Marv Adams sees the fundamental role that IT will play in transforming Ford back into the powerhouse it can be.  (I’m not a believer that the domestic car company’s are going to bankrupt-tank in the face of the imports – I’ll blog on this shortly).  Marv Adams believes that Ford can become a real time enterprise and link their cash registers (their Dealership's Dealer Management Systems) with their production systems - which in turn can be - and will be - linked into their suppliers systems.  He's right.  It can be done, it will be done and I believe that Marv Adams would like to see Ford get there first.

I google'd and found an interesting interview that Marv Adams did in January 2003 with CIOInsight – a ZD magazine.  To me these quotes tell the tale of the tape as to why Marv now reports to both Jim Padilla – Ford’s COO and Bill Ford – Ford’s CEO:

On why he took the job with Ford:
“There was recognition by Ford CEO Bill Ford … that IT was one of several key competencies that Ford Motor Co. must be best at…to build the best cars and trucks...”

On his “Back to Basics” mantra at Ford:
“Our Back to Basics discipline is all about how we manage the core information of the business. That's fundamental and it flows through product development, manufacturing, sales and marketing”

On Collaboration and why it matters to a car and truck company:
“What’s occurring today is … concurrent engineering. Simultaneous engineering is becoming a reality as collaboration tools enable development to occur simultaneously in multiple locations, not only within Ford but with key Ford suppliers and partners, enabled by technology”

On real time systems:
“Our view of real-time systems is that you can sense rapidly what's happening, and you can respond in the appropriate amount of time. And that enables you to be as flexible as you need to be in the different segments of your business. …  you … build a common language across your data infrastructure and company. You decouple the data from your legacy applications so that you can build a Web services-like technology infrastructure. And almost like Legos, build the kind of business solutions that support the different parts of the company”

On the timing of becoming a real time company (remember this interview was done ~ 30 months ago) :
“real-time systems is certainly an aspiration that we are targeting for over the next five to seven years”

On the emphasis to someday sense “demand” at the dealership real-time:
“Yes, we're doing that today. And over time it gets a lot more automated, it's a lot more real time”

On the emphasis to be information competent:
“What we have to do and what we are doing is gradually transforming the competencies of our business to become experts at dealing with information. So people who understand how to mine information, see patterns and then respond to those patterns, and people who can do that who aren't in the IT organization are using the information that we've designed into our business system”

Marv Adams believes in the real time enterprise.  He understands the power of a service oriented architecture.  He’s sees how IT is about to deliver another fundamental order-of-magnitude gain in productivity to companies that adopt aggressively and correctly (similar to the gains the PC gave the worker - correctly architected IT will do the same for the company).

He wants to help lead Ford toward the same places that Wal-Mart and Dell enjoy in their respective industries.  He sees how that can happen and he was promoted for it.

GM and the Hype Machine...

I think that the broad Media (MSNBC, CNBC, WSJ, etc.) has hyped GM’s troubles a bit too much of late.  Nothing like kicking somebody when they are down, I suppose. 

I know this - Kirk Kerkorian is making out.  At $ 3 per share profit at last count (today's close - approximately) Mr. K. has made about $55M.  Not bad for a weeks' worth of work.

Don’t get me wrong – GM has some legitimate issues.  The recent quarterly loss is a big one ($1.1B) and they do have a sizeable health care burden haunting them (in a recent article I read GM was public with saying it carried medical costs equivalent to $1,500 per vehicle). 

But consider some facts:

-         GM US Market share loss – the statistic that most folks in the industry are screaming about – has dropped less then 2% since 1998. (source Morgan Stanley)

-     GM remains the largest, most successful car company in the world.  Toyota is gaining but GM is still number one.  That's numero uno, in case you brushed past that point.

-         2005 Year-to-date GM Chevrolet sales have risen in the following markets

Asia – up 139%

North America – up 2%

Europe – up 25%

South America, Africa and  Middle East – up 19%

------- Source (Automotive News:  GM)

-         Chevrolet is a world-wide recognized tier-1 brand on par with Coca-Cola

-         GM ranks tops in quality:  GM is the only domestic manufacturer to rank above the industry average in the J.D. Power Vehicle dependability study. 

-         And don’t forget the Solstice – GM sold 1,000 online in 41 minutes.

Finally – did you see that Kerkorian was not successful in getting his hands on the 28 million shares he wanted to buy at $31 per share?  This at a time – when GM was trading at historical lows of around $28 per share?  (He ended up getting only ~ 18.9 million shares).  Could it be that the market – so to speak – spoke referendum style and voted in confidence that GM can and will successfully restructure?  Time will tell…

Disconected CRM - Part 2 or "1 reason I will buy a Solstice"

Tic Toc. Tic Toc. 8 days later says the clock …

Yesterday - I left the process with the notion that I had given myself as a "lead" with Mitsubishi regarding buying a $30K car.  After hitting submit on the form - they let me know that I would be contacted by the dealership I had selected from a list that prompted.

Following yesterdays format - here's the transcation to where it stands today.  I'm posting my thoughts in bold above the screen shot or "godin-image" to convey the process.

But let me set the stage.

Time has passed.  Not 5 minutes but 8 days.  I'm a "lead" that's going stale... and no one - not a sole has checked in on me.  It's possible to create a business proces where I could get called in a matter of minutes.  Service Magic is a great example.  The astounding thing is that the cost to implement this is not huge.  Good planning and a little bit of capital, some smart people and a willingness or motivation to fix the issue would get - could get a system in place to have my phone ringing in about 5 minutes after I hit the submit button.  The technology to do this is straight-forward sure enough.  And the economics most certainly justify the companies in question (auto makers) to do this.  Given all the pain in the auto industry that the media is hyping - you'd think the motivation is there.

________________________________________________

Tic Toc....

10_2

________________________________________________

Hey I got an email.  Mitsubishi North America would like me to take a survey. 

Here's what it says

Dear James,

Thank you for your interest in purchasing a new Mitsubishi vehicle and for submitting an inquiry to XXXXXXX MITSUBISHI.

In an effort to ensure your satisfaction and to verify that you or a member for your household have been contacted by XXXXXXX  MITSUBISHI, please help us by responding to a brief two-question survey by clicking on the following link or copying and pasting it into your browser:

http://mitsubishicars.com/MMSA/ResponseSurvey?UUID=8e133499 ...

Thank you for your help.  We appreciate your interest in purchasing a new Mitsubishi.

Sincerely

Mitsubishi North America, Inc.

11_2

________________________________________________

Hmmm – satisfaction survey – 2 questions – no 1 out of 1000 wins a prize if I take it – ummm – oh well here we go:

Q:  How satisfied are you with the response you received to your inquiry?

A: I did not receive a response

Q:  How did XXXXXXXX MITSUBISHI contact you?

A: I did not receive a response

Uh-oh.  These guys have never-ever read a Godin book – no wonder there are problems – looks good submit …

12_2

________________________________________________

Hmmm

An error occurred while processing your request. Please contact our site administrator for assistance.

Hmmm – let me hit the back button - take that survey again …

13_2

________________________________________________

Hmmm - the big website is saying to me in red letters:

"You have already responded to this survey."

Uh-huh – yep – that would be the problem …

14_2

________________________________________________

Tic Toc.

8 days since the email…

16 days since declaring my original interest…

You know what – Lutz is right – that Solstice looks awesome!  GM has their own website for it – now that’s cool – Solstice summer ride here I come …

15_1

________________________________________________

Solstice

19K MSRP

Pontiac recorded a 1,400% jump in website traffic and all 1,000 certificates to be the first to buy a Solstice were gone in 41 minutes following the airing of “The Apprentice.”

Solstice_1

Disconnected CRM - Part 1

As a learning exercise to prove a couple points to myself I decided to run through the process of hitting a car makers website and go through the lead generation process.  I had my stop-watch with me. And I took screen shots of the transaction.  What follows is part 1 of a process where I "gave" the car maker "me" as a lead.  The format I follow below is some thoughts above a GIF image ... which I think flows okay.

During this process - I reminded myself that we truly are in the internet age and that we truly do have connected systems.  I had to pinch myself though.  Surely - a carmaker as big as Mistubishi, spending as much as they are on their website could do better than this.  In an age where point of sale systems are connected to supply chains real-time and should this kind of lead generation process be more sophisticated? 

Yes.  They should.  There's no excuse for it.  The systems should be stream-lined and architected - straight-through.  I ought to have a Dealership calling me within 5 minutes of hitting submit once I drop my lead into the funnel. 

Impossible you say?  Try Service Magic.  I did.  I needed someone to powerwash my deck.  Within 5 minutes of submitting me as a lead - I got three - three competing phonecalls for my business.

Let's watch Mitsubishi...

In part 2 - I'll post tomorrow - I'll offer some thoughts and conclusions about the process.  I know this - I had fun doing it and learned a little.

_________________________________________________

The 2006 Mistubishi Eclipse would be a fun third car – hmmm …

1

_________________________________________________

Okay – Stylish sporty interior – my 13 year old son likes it – “It looks cool Dad!” …

2

_________________________________________________

“Very Cool Dad!” – my 8 year old son says– “It looks like a race car!” …

3

_________________________________________________

Let’s hit their website and see what we can seewww.mitsubishi.comMaybe I need to have a 2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse! – just click on the links …

4

_________________________________________________

Okay – hmmm – MSRP about $19K – I want all the packages, must have the options – sun and sound package – oh yeah gotta have’em – oh no don’t like the default color – let’s go with black – click, click, click and click!  YES! …

5

_________________________________________________

Okay – 29K with the extras – not bad, not bad – let’s get this done before my wife sees (just kidding-she has fully authorized and approved this transaction) – Oye – they want my zip code – okay – here ya go – Submit! …

6

_________________________________________________

Okay – zip code in – what does this say?  Hmmm

“Choose a Dealer.    Here is your closest internet-certified Mitsubishi Dealer.  To select this dealer, press Continue and you’ll be required to enter your contact information so that the selected Dealer can contact you to respond to your inquiry. Or you can find additional dealers near you.”

Ummm – Okay I could have done this on Google but we’ll roll with it – I will go with the Xxxxxx Dealership – 12.17 miles from me – not 12 miles – 12.17 miles! …

Hmmm – okay my name, my address and the big email address – hear ya go – I will purchase in 4-6 months – I want a payment around $250 a month – I will put $10K down – that will get their attention! – and submit! YES! …

8

_________________________________________________

Hmmm…

“Thanks for you inquiry. An E-commerce specialist from XXXXXXXX MITSUBISHI will contact you soon about your customized new Mistubishi vehicle.  In the meantime, feel free to return to www.mitsubishi.com to learn more.”

Ummm – sort of a lost opportunity – these guys should read a few Godin books – and get on the permission-based marketing wagon oye – why not pull me deeper in – offer me a payment calculator or get my on a voice-over-IP call with a rep that can talk me into a test drive – or better yet – why isn’t my email sounding off I have an email from them telling me I matter? Hmmm …

9_1

_________________________________________________

Tic Toc. Tic Toc. 8 days later says the clock …

10

_________________________________________________

More to come in Disconnected CRM - Part 2